Students

From Curiosity to Action: How Janay Russo Found Her Calling in Law

Posted
November 22, 2024
Image
Janay Russo, student at Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

When 3L Janay Russo was exploring colleges, she found herself captivated by a pressing question: Why does such severe inequality persist within the legal system? Her unrelenting curiosity about the foundations of law and the societal and economic biases shaping the criminal justice system, inspired her to pursue an undergraduate degree in Justice Studies and Criminology at James Madison University.

A defining moment in Janay’s journey came during an undergraduate internship at a rehabilitation home, where she had the opportunity to advocate for women transitioning from incarceration to society. Witnessing the immense hardships these women faced was equally humbling and eye-opening. Yet, being a reliable source of support for those in need, brought her an incredible sense of fulfillment that solidified her decision to pursue a career in law.

As a first-generation student, Janay draws strength from her close-knit and supportive family, crediting her parents for inspiring her to strive for excellence and become her best self. She is incredibly grateful for their encouragement to stretch herself outside of her comfort zone–something she considers the secret to her success. Taking a page from her parent’s book, Janay greatly admires inspiring others to be their best self, a quality she also treasures with her friends at Haub Law. The connections she has made in law school feel like family–a chosen community that motivates and uplifts one another, even during the most challenging moments.

Janay’s inspired support at Haub Law didn’t end with her classmates, it also extended into her interactions with the faculty. She has always been excited to learn from the engaging faculty; one standout being Professor Waldman, whose class piqued her interest in the federal court system and led to an internship with the Honorable Chief Judge Nevins in the bankruptcy court for the District of Connecticut during her 1L year. As a 2L, Janay participated in the Federal Judicial Honors Program, where she externed in the chambers of the Honorable Judge Seibel for the Southern District of New York. The combined experience of working for the court changed the direction of her law school interests. Being in chambers on two separate occasions, forged a new career path she didn’t know she was interested in–clerking! Janay now has her sights set on being a clerk post-graduation to fulfill her passion for research and writing. Having the opportunity to watch a trial from start to finish and help draft decisions has been extremely rewarding.

What is next for Janay post-graduation? She is proud to share her efforts have come full circle. Janay recently accepted a clerkship for a federal bankruptcy judge in the Northern District of Georgia. When asked what advice she would leave aspiring students, Janay shares, “Don’t shy away from things that make you uncomfortable.” “Law school involves a lot of growing, exploring, and changes–all things that make people uncomfortable, but with the discomfort comes incredible opportunities, joyful new experiences, and friendships for a lifetime."

More from Pace

In the Media

Professor Bennett L. Gershman of Pace Law School writes in Law.com on the enduring impact of racial discrimination in jury selection. In the op-ed “Race Discrimination Still Infects Jury Trials,” published in the New York Law Journal, Bennett L. Gershman examines how racial bias continues to shape capital jury trials and critiques courts’ willingness to excuse such practices, arguing that racial justice must not be sacrificed for procedural convenience.

In the Media

Professor Bennett L. Gershman, distinguished professor at Pace University’s Elisabeth Haub School of Law, appears in Salon discussing why accountability for the January 6 insurrection ultimately collapsed. In the article “We Learned Nothing From Jan. 6,” Bennett L. Gershman explains that while the indictments against former President Trump were strong and supported by overwhelming evidence, the complexities and timing of the prosecution — coupled with Trump’s election — allowed him to evade accountability.